| 
             I came of age in
            Montana.  Since I was a
            kid, I have seen it snow every month of the year, except July. 
            And it has snowed in July in some places in Montana, I hear. 
            Driving in snow, ice, and slush indeed presents its
            challenges, especially when trying to stop safely.
            
             
            I recall my
            older brother driving my classmate and me home from school one nasty
            winter day.  He stopped
            on the icy road to drop off my friend. 
            Smash!  In an
            instant, we all experienced Newton’s first law of motion: 
            Every
            object moves in a straight line unless acted upon by an outside
            force.  The
            car behind us moved in straight line all right as it slid into our
            back bumper, breaking both of its front headlights.
            
             
            When I turned
            fifteen, I took driver’s education. 
            Our teacher impressed on us tactics for driving during winter
            conditions.  Slamming on
            the brakes would most likely precipitate skidding, which was not a
            good thing.  Pumping the
            brakes was our best ally to literally get a better grip on the road. 
            It wasn’t until I entered college that I fully understood
            the physics behind this winter driving wisdom.
            
             
            Our freshman
            college course concentrated on the laws of motion. 
            The most prevalent natural force in the universe is gravity. 
            Another pervasive macroscopic force is friction. 
            And there are different kinds of friction – static and
            kinetic.
            
             
            One of our
            “real fun” physics labs was to measure coefficients of friction
            (commonly denoted as µ) for µ (static) and µ (kinetic). 
            Our lab instructor directed us to put metal bricks on ramps. 
            These bricks were tethered to a line stretched over a pulley
            and attached to counter weights, which would tend to pull the brick
            up the ramp.  Then we
            would pile on counter weights to observe the balance of forces
            acting on the brick:  The force of gravity on the brick and friction was equal
            and opposite to the force of counter weights.
             (Check
            out, if you wish, the following applet for a demo: 
            http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/kap4/cd095a.htm) 
            We needed to
            note the counter weight (force) on the brick the moment it started
            sliding up the ramp.  This
            measurement allowed us to calculate the “static” coefficient of
            friction, µ (static).  It
            got even trickier when the brick started moving. 
            We had to adjust the counter weights and ensure the brick was
            moving at a constant velocity.  The
            new value of the counter weights allowed us to calculate the
            “kinetic” coefficient of friction, µ (kinetic). 
            
            
             
            The point of the
            lab was to show that the “static” and the “kinetic”
            coefficients of friction for the same materials were different. 
            Indeed, the static value was greater than the kinetic. 
            Hence, we usually had to nudge the brick to get it moving to
            overcome static friction.
            
             
            What does
            this have to do with winter driving? 
            Everything.
            
             
            If the driver
            slams on the brakes and the tires lock, the immobile tires are
            sliding on the surface beneath it. 
            Hence the friction is “kinetic” since the two surfaces
            are moving relative to each other. 
            If the driver pumps the brakes to keep the tires rolling, the
            point of contact of the tires to the surface is at rest relative to
            one another.  Therefore,
            the friction is “static.”
            
             
            Here are some
            measured values for the coefficients of static and kinetic friction
            of tires on different surfaces (courtesy of  http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/211_fall2002.web.dir/Ben_Townsend/StaticandKineticFriction.htm): 
              
            Surfaces                     
            µ (static)          
            µ (kinetic) 
            
             
            Tire on
            concrete          
            1.00                
            0.80 
            
             
            Tire on wet road          
            0.60                
            0.40 
            
             
            Tire on snow               
            0.30                
            0.20
            
             
              
            The table above
            shows that rolling tires, gripping the road with static friction,
            have greater friction than locked tires, sliding on the road with
            kinetic friction, whether the surfaces are dry, slushy, or snowy. 
            Therefore, rolling tires have the best chance of stopping the
            vehicle safely.  In fact,
            many cars today have computerized anti-lock braking systems (ABS),
            which will sense the rotation of the tires and prevent the wheels
            from locking while braking.
            
             
            Coefficients of
            friction may not be the most exciting topic, but their application
            is very practical.  As
            for my driver’s education teacher, his advice was backed by the
            sound physics - literally where the rubber meets the road.
            
             
            So pump those
            brakes (or get a smart car to do it for you) and be safe!
            
             
             
              |